Monday, July 31, 2006

Back Online

Sorry, faithful readers, of whom I hope to have a few before too long, about being off-line for a week. I am about to get this blog up and running at last. Later this week, I hope, I will have a discussion with my frequent interlocutor, Sam Kliger, director of Russian-Jewish Affairs at the American Jewish Committee, about the situation in Israel and what should be done from here on. I will share some insights on a story I have been strugglin with for weeks concerning the knotty matter of Pope Pius and the Jews. Then next Sunday, I'm off to Israel for a week for a long awaited reunion with my Israeli relatives amidst the chaos and carnage now ensuing. Then I will have two weeks in Crimea with Tanya and her family, hopefully blogging a good deal on realities in Ukraine and our mutual search for the lost world of the Khazars. Anyway, Rubyjewsday is back on line. Thanks, Dima!

Continued...

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

84 - 16

I woke up early Sunday morning to the horrible news that a Hezbollah missile had just killed 8 people in a train depot in Haifa, my old home town from my days of living in Israel during the late 1970’s. Then I went to the studios of Russian Television International (RTVI) in Manhattan where I did a session of Viktor Topaler’s Crossfire show, where I debated the situation in the Middle East with a Russian journalist named Mikhail Stoyanov. At the end of the session, Topaler announced that audience members, voting from their homes through some sort of high tech wizardry, had ruled that Stoyonov had won the debate over Ruby 84-16.

In truth, I thought I did pretty well in the discussion. I argued that Israel had the absolute right to hit Hizbollah hard and would have to do so for at least a while to restore its deterrent capacity. I cautioned however that an all-out attack on Lebanon that ended up killing large numbers of innocent civilians would strengthen Hizbollah, not weaken it, by bringing it thousands of new recruits and swinging Lebanon back to a pro-Syrian position. I urged the international community, spearheaded by the U.S., impose a settlement that would involve placing an international force in south Lebanon that would push Hezbollah far away from the border region.

Still, I was destined to ‘lose’ the debate from the very beginning when the supposedly neutral moderator, Topaler, asked me whether the latest chain of events had convinced me that I and liberal American Jewry—together with the U.S. government--had been wrong all along in forcing Israel into making all manner of egregious concessions, such as the pullouts from Lebanon and Gaza, which had now placed Israel in such a terrible strategic position. I replied that no one had pressured Arik Sharon to execute his unilateral pull out of Gaza—it had been his own conception--that he had sold to the Bush Administration, not the other way around. I also noted that every right-wing Israeli leader, from Begin to Netanyahu to Sharon moderates his position upon assuming power because he quickly realizes that tiny Israel--population 6 million--cannot win a decisive military victory against hundreds of millions of Arabs and 1.2 billion Muslims; that an efficacious combination of force and diplomacy are needed to bring lasting peace and security to the Jewish state.

It didn’t really matter what I said, because Topaler and his international Russian Jewish audience are not now in any mood to hear that Israel should do anything else but blow its Muslim tormentors to kingdom come. Talk and macho posturing are cheap of course, and it was noteworthy that when I asked Topaler and Stoyonov whether they were advocating that Israel should attack Syria or Iran, each equivocated and appeared to suggest that the U.S., rather than Israel, should be the one to attack Iran. On one hand, Topaler blames Washington for not permitting Israel to go to war against the entire Muslim world and, on the other he appears to suggest America should go to war on Israel’s behalf.

Of course, it’s easy to be macho from six thousand miles away, but, in fairness, much of the RTVI audience is right there in Israel, as one caller to the program living in Ashdod who called in to blame the U.S. for restraining Israel, reminded us. I feel very deeply their hurt, fear and deep anger at the present situation. After living for decades in the Soviet Union where they were routinely taunted as zhidi (kikes) on trams and subways, where they were prevented from entering universities because of their Jewishness; where they were forced to sit quietly while the Soviet government received Yasser Arafat on his many visits to Moscow as a great hero and Soviet newspapers showed hook-nosed Zionists wearing Nazi armpatches; Soviet Jews came at last to their Jewish homeland and have had endure years of suicide bombing and now a barrage of missiles directed at themselves and their loved ones. Of course, given all of that, many Russian Jews in Israel have a black and white cartoon picture of the world, where silnaya ruka (a strong hand), this time a Jewish silnaya ruka, rather than a Soviet one, is the only answer. And hundreds of thousands of ex-Soviet Jews here in the U.S., worried sick over close family members and loved ones in Israel and feeling far away and helpless, are feeling the same emotion in spades.

So I understand very well the reason so many Russian Jews have adopted a hard right wing position. Given that I am also very aware of how large and influential a part of the Israeli and international Jewish polity Russian Jews have become, I am ready to stick my neck out and lose many more debates 84-16, if I can impact a few of them to rethink such simplistic formulas and work instead for a just peace in the Middle East that gives security and a decent future both to the children of Israel and to Palestinian and Lebanese ones as well. Without inflating my importance too much—nu, so go ahead and inflate, already—that’s one of my main missions for what’s left of my life. God knows, it ain’t gonna be easy. And now, please God, if you are out there somewhere, please do something to end this horror in our beautiful Israel—where I am supposed to travel in three weeks—and in Gaza and Lebanon as well, before it consumes any more lives. Maspeek, Zastatichye, Enough!

Continued...

Friday, July 14, 2006

On The Latest Horrors In Israel

Several hours ago I accepted an invitation from far-right RTVI (Russian Television International) talk show host Victor Topaler to appear on his program this Sunday morning July 16 at 11 AM. Victor, a charming raconteur I like very much, who claims, at least for rhetorical purposes, to be a supporter of the late Rabbi Meir Kahane and his call to expel the Arabs from Eretz Israel, told me he wants to use the opportunity of my appearance on his show “to tear you and the other lefties apart” for supposedly leading Israel down the road to surrender. Look at the catastrophe that has taken place since last summer’s pullout from Gaza, says Victor, pointing to the katushya rocket fire at Sderot and later Ashkelon, the capture of one Israeli soldier by Hamas and two more by Hizbollah, the killing of a number of several others during Hizbollah raids into Israel, and now the rocket shelling of northern Israeli cities, including Nahariya, Safed and my old home town of Haifa. The left, Victor says, is to blame for all of this.

I agreed to go on Victor’s show, as I have done on several occasions in the past, despite the fact that my poor command of the Russian language will make it hard for me to argue effectively in Russian a point of view that has precious little support in the international Russian community. Nu, shto deliyat? Victor has a large international Russian-Jewish audience and I have a moral responsibility to do what I can to convince Russian Jews, whether in Beersheva, Berlin or Boston that the mailed fist, the silnaya ruka, is not the way to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian and Muslim-Jewish conflict.

First of all, Victor is dead wrong to blame the left for the failure of the Gaza pullout to lead Israelis closer to peace and security. It was not Walter Ruby, Peace Now or the editorial board of Ha’aretz that convinced the majority of Israelis to support the pullout from Gaza. It was Ariel Sharon, Israel’s toughest and most implacable politician for the last 50 years, the man who spearheaded the building of settlements all over the West Bank and Gaza, who finally decided to change course and pull out of Gaza. Yet I did not agree with that policy decision. I and many others on the left have argued consistently that Sharon’s policy of ‘unilateral separation’; which says that Israel can unilaterally set its own borders, is a delusion. The only way to end the conflict is to reach a comprehensive settlement with the Palestinians.

Yet Sharon did not change his thinking at the end of his long military and political career because he became a soft-headed old man. Rather, he understood at long last that the permanent occupation of Gaza and the West Bank was rapidly transforming Israel from a Jewish state into a bi-national one. He was right about that, and nothing that has happened in the past year has changed that equation or ended that danger.

Yet how can Israel reach an agreement with the likes of Hamas, which now runs the Palestinian government, or with Hizbollah, both Islamic fundamentalist groups that advocate the destruction of Israel? I agree peace is impossible as long as the leadership on the other side vows to destroy the Jewish state, and, at present, Israel has little choice but to take military action to destroy as much as possible of the military infrastructure of Hamas and Hizbollah. At the same time, we should remember that many Palestinians do not support Hamas and many Lebanese Shiites do not support Hizbollah. Indeed, I believe these groups would fall from power tomorrow if Palestinians and South Lebanese were given reason to believe a decent peace settlement was possible. Yet if we continue to lash out militarily and kill a lot of Palestinian and Lebanese civilians through air strikes in densely populated areas of Gaza and Beirut, we will only succeed in strengthening Hamas and Hizbollah rather than weakening them. Just as Hamas missile attacks on Sderot and Ashkelon failed to intimidate Israelis but instead strengthened their determination to strike back forcefully, Israeli attacks on civilians in Gaza and Beirut only cause Palestinians and Lebanese to swallow their doubts about the Islamic extremists and line up behind them.

Victor Topaler advocates that Israel pursue the harshest of military solutions, regardless of the hatred and resentment of Israel that will evoke around the world, including here in the U.S. I maintain that ultimately there is no military solution available to Israel; a conclusion that was also reached by Sharon, Bibi Netanyahu, Menachem Begin and all the other Israeli leaders who talked tough before coming to power, but sought peace agreements once they took over. The same thing will happen tomorrow if Netanyahu comes back or even if Lieberman takes over. The most profound lesson of this 100 year conflict is that neither side is strong enough to destroy the other. If that were the case, one side would have won by now and the violence would be over. Silnaya Ruka is not the answer. When this present spasm of killing ends, after enormous pain and suffering on both sides, we will be right back where we started, eying each other across a barbed wire fence. Israelis and Palestinians, Jews and Arabs, are fated to live together.

What is the ultimate answer? I saw a piece of it three months ago when I was in Seville, Spain at the International Conference of Imams and Rabbis, where Muslim and Jewish leaders from around the world, including a large Israeli delegation headed by Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi Yona Metzger and a delegation of Palestinian imams from Gaza, talked, ate, sang and danced together for four days. At the conference, Rabbi Zion Cohen from Sderot, a town where the katushyas were already falling on a daily basis, offered to work with Imam Mahmoud Muhabbash of Gaza to try to get food to the people of Gaza. He said, "Despite losing a close relative to a Kassam rocket fired at Sderot from Gaza, I feel deeply for the people of Gaza and want to help alleviate their plight.” Muhabbash, who said he frequently pleads with his own youth not to become suicide bombers, accepted Cohen´s proposal, stating, "Inshallah, let us try.”

That human impulse, that Jewish impulse, to open a dialogue and to build human ties with the ‘Other’ is the ultimate answer. At this bleakest of moments, let us not give way to despair. Despite everything that has happened, for the sake of the children of Israel, let us embrace the path of the Jewish and Muslim leaders in Seville, and redouble our resolve to find a way to peace.

Continued...

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

An Appeal To Alec Brook-Krasny And Ari Kagan

Early in the campaign, an astute observer of the Russian political scene said to me, “It’s going to be a hell of an election campaign, but I’m afraid that Alec and Ari will end up eating each other.”

At that point, I took my friend’s words to mean that the two Russian candidates would split the Russian vote in half and end up electing a non-Russian candidate, presumably the incumbent, Adele Cohen, who despises the organized Russian community as fervently as it despises her back. Now that Adele has dropped out and Brook-Krasny has become the favorite in the race, that scenario seems less likely, although still possible, given the probable presence of Marty Levine and Cole Ettman in the race (Levine seems more likely to stay in at this juncture than does Ettman). But even if Brook-Krasny ultimately prevails in the primary, as many political observers now expect; or conversely, if Kagan somehow manages to pull off an upset and win the race, Brook-Krasny and Kagan may still end up eating each other if they run a scorched earth, no-holds-barred race against the other replete with smear tactics that end up soiling their reputations and leaving lasting bitterness in the community.

I fear that may already be happening. Each of the candidates is presently being dragged through the mud by supporters of the other. I understand a leaflet has been circulating through Brighton Beach, which Kagan said did not come from his campaign, excoriating Brook-Krasny for manifold sins, including supposedly being a stooge of Russian President Vladimir Putin. On the other side, Brook-Krasny’s supporters tell me Kagan is simply “crazy” for staying in the race, even though Brook-Krasny has been anointed by the Russian power structure and American political bigshots like Nadler, Kruger and Recchia, and that Kagan is nothing but a hack journalist who has no qualifications for the job.

The intensity of the mutual smear-fest is accelerating and likely to get worse in the coming weeks. For one thing there is widespread expectation in the community that the two campaigns may challenge each other’s nominating petitions before the Board of Elections next month. If that were to happen, it would be a very cynical display indeed, considering that in the six years since Brook-Krasny first challenged Adele Cohen, who promptly got him kicked off the ballot on a technicality, nearly every Russian candidate has had his or her petitions challenged by an American incumbent. Petition challenges may be one of the ‘rules of the game’ in Brooklyn politics, but it is a patently anti-democratic brand of politics that is full of abuses and reminds many Russians more than a little of the old Soviet Union. Brook-Krasny’s own credibility was shaken in 2001 when he himself challenged the petitions of another Russian candidate, Inna Stavitsky. So if Brook-Krasny and Kagan claim to represent a new and more open form of politics in 2006, they should avoid participating in the ugly game of petition challenges.

In general, Ari and Alec should take a deep breath or two, and resolve to take the high road in their competition before things spin out of control. Ari and Alec may not realize it amidst the heat of the campaign, but they have a great deal in common. Both are immensely charming natural-born politicians who have mastered the American techniques of glad-handing, baby-kissing and spinning the media as well as American-born politicians with decades more experience. Intriguingly, in a nominally Democratic community that voted over 75 percent for George W. Bush in 2004, both Brook-Krasny and Kagan are political progressives who have used their influence to get better housing, social benefits and police protection for large numbers of poor and elderly Russian-speakers. Both genuinely seek to build political alliances between the Russian-speaking community and African-Americans and other constituencies in the area.

Beyond that, both are quality candidates and quality human beings, and engaging in personal nastiness is really below either of them. Either would make a first-rate representative for the 46th District and would do the Russian-speaking community proud as its first representative in government.

As to the above charges, it is true that Alec chose to work together with a former Soviet diplomat and United Nations official named Vadim Perfilyev last year to improve relations between Russia and the Russian Jewish community here, and made an ill-advised statement to me in an earlier Jewish Week piece that “Russia is moving toward becoming part of the global family of democratic countries.” The full text of this article can be found here.

Yet, in recent months, Brook-Krasny has done some adroit damage control on the issue; acknowledging he was “mistaken” in asserting that Russia is moving toward democracy, adding that the government of President Vladimir Putin is “crazy” for selling nuclear material to Iran and providing diplomatic support to that country. Stating emphatically that “It is now clear that Russia is moving in the wrong direction,” Brook-Krasny pointedly stayed away from a meeting of Russian “compatriots” held at the Russian Embassy in Washington in early May at which he been scheduled to speak, even though some of his most prominent supporters were organizers of the affair.

Whatever one thinks of Brook-Krasny’s past outreach efforts toward the Russian government, which appears to have been impelled in part by his natural propensity for coalition-building and in part by a somewhat grandiose desire to mix in the world of international diplomacy, it is simply outrageous to smear Brook-Krasny as a “fifth columnist” for Putin, as some supporters of Kagan have been heard to mutter. Like Kagan, Brook-Krasny is a proud American and a staunch supporter of Israel; his desire to engage the Russian government and keep it from slipping again into anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism springs from those moral imperatives. To suggest he is a Russian agent somehow embedded into the bosom of the Russian-Jewish community of Brooklyn is an outrageous slander that is simply beneath contempt.

As for partisans of Brook-Krasny calling me to deride Ari Kagan as “nothing but a journalist,” it is always a mistake to tell one journalist that another journalist isn’t qualified to run for political office because he is nothing but a lowly scribbler. Besides, Kagan has been as much of a community activist as he has been a journalist for years now. In fact, my own complaint about Ari on this point, which I shared with him on more than one occasion is that he had become too much of a community activist, to the point where he sometimes forgot that a reporter is supposed to be an objective observer, not an advocate for a particular cause.

Still, like many other journalists before him, Ari came to the point where he wanted not only to observe the political fray, but to jump in and fight for his own vision. He deserves nothing but respect for that. To claim that he has done nothing for the community simply because he does not have a position of power like Alec did at COJECO is to dismiss his many efforts to improve conditions in the district for poor and middle class people alike. At a time when many politicians see their main role as comforting the comfortable, Ari Kagan makes his stand as a voice of the little people and all power to him for that.

So here is my appeal to my friends, Ari and Alec: Rebyta, davaite jit druzna.

Please don’t eat each other or cut each others’ throats. The truth is that the Russian community needs both of you, the Jewish community needs both of you, and New York needs the talents and political passion that both of you bring to the table. If one or the other of you wins this election, there ought to be space for the other to run for another political position a year or two down the road with the support of the community leadership. The Russian-speaking community can be proud to have placed two such quality candidates in the field. God forbid you should destroy each other and hurt the entire community.

Continued...